I’m Back

This site crashed a few months ago really, really, really hard. It looks like it may have been hacked and then exploded when trying to do an update of the plugins and such.

Fortunately, the folks at Dreamhost were able to help me do a complete restore of the site.

Also, I noticed it came back with a theme from around 2006 with valid XHTML. Digg This!

Screen shot of restored website with ancient theme

It’s kind of fun to view the source and remember some of the old techniques. Notice this IE6 comment.

<!–[if IE6]> <p id=”iewarning”>Sorry, this site is for advanced CSS programming. As such, it is not optimized for IE6. Please visit this site with <a href=”http://www.mozilla.com“>Firefox</a>, <a href=”http://www.opera.com“>Opera</a>, <a href=”http://wwww.mac.com“>Safari</a>, or another modern browser.  Microsoft has recently released a beta version of Internet Explorer 7, you may even want to try that for a better internet experience in general.</p> <![endif]–>

Display:Contents and the Impact on Accessibility

I came across a bizarre experience while testing a Styled-Component prototype with VoiceOver and Chrome. This simple panel had an H2 in the code, but I couldn’t navigate to it with the screen reader. I opened the accessibility inspector in Chrome and sure enough, the H2 had no semantics. It was being rendered to the Accessibility API as if it was a div.

Continue reading “Display:Contents and the Impact on Accessibility”

Notes from W3C Workshop on Permissions and User Consent

W3C Workshop on Permissions and User Consent

September 26, 27, San Diego

The problems with web permissions – W3C User consent and permissions working group

Much of the value of the internet is based on user trust of the internet. As this trust is broken, the internet is devalued.

The overload of permission requests is causing fatigue and reducing the trust. People are becoming fatigued to cookie reminders and popups and leading to blindly clicking on acceptance.

Loading a permissions request as soon as the page loads doesn’t allow the user to trust the site, what does it represent, and why they should allow the service.

Confusing wording, especially for nefarious purposes
“uncheck here to continue to not receive notifications”

Bundled, implied, inherited permissions. You accept a master permission request without knowing it has a set of sub-permissions.

Blocking content until permissions are granted is keeping users from gaining trust and understanding the value of the site. Tumbler has a full page takeover

Conversation points
(audience includes browser manufacturers, publishers, academia, and W3C leaders)

  • What is required by law? some of the complexity is part of the legal requirements
  • Disagree with sharing data, data still shared
  • Context – what is actually inferred in the data sharing, for instance geolocation providing home location
  • Can consent be withdrawn easily
  • Are users really informed, too complex
  • Permissions process should also follow WCAG accessibility guidelines
  • Trust is gone, people already assume the system is corrupt.
  • Signal/noise – confuse user into consent
  • Understanding a company’s use of data is overwhelming from the inside, due to fragmentation in development process. So how do you legitimately declare your data usage?
  • Sensors that don’t require permissions can be used for fingerprinting.  what should we be prompting for and are there any backwards permissions that need to be adopted.
  • Users throw up their hands. with so many permissions and sensors being used, people may give up from frustration.  fatigue or fatalism
  • Do not track included transparent information, such as privacy policy location, opt out process, etc.
  • Should settings for what you give consent be in the browser or in the web site.
  • Readable language may make it easier to read, but it doesn’t mean that it is providing a full grasp of what the permissions are allowing, such as cameras accessing private details that go beyond a selfie or light/color detection (expected use)
  • Problem is with premise: we need to obtain permission to do these things. Do we need to have them at all? Should browsers be sharing this in the first place? Apple’s storage access API turns off the function. someone that allows this is open to abuse. So, the prompt is at the device level, not the web. What features do we believe the web platform needs? Should there be a baseline for what browsers do not share.
  • We can build an API that restricts access, but people could realize they didn’t ask for permission, so they use a polyfill that uses a previously consented API to pull in additional information. Such as using the camera app to determine location or sound.
  • Good example: input type file, drag and drop… these are implicitly given permission via the platform.
  • The browser should be handling the permissions model.
  • There are three actors:
    • The perfect actor
    • The absolute devil
    • Everyone else. People that provide a useful service, but also want as much data as possible to earn a profit.  It’s not that they want as much data, they may be forced to get that much data within the advertising industry.  Publishers would prefer browsers stop this.
  • Advertising is the center of most data abuse. Advertising industry is requiring this data and forcing sites to abuse the process. Brave is an example of a browser that is not allowing third party data exchange.
  • The internet has grown quickly via organized chaos. Business models are built on this, not all is for abusing the system. But we shouldn’t allow this to prevent the next generation of applications.
  • should the web give access to sensors and devices? in the term of IoT? How do we allow the web of things while providing privacy, such as discovering other devices? Some devices may not have a display and permissions are asked via secondary interfaces.
  • There’s still a difficulty of understanding the downstream information from a single page
  • Who owns this problem?
    • web platform
    • publisher
    • government/laws.
    • All of these move at different speeds
  • The web is inherently casual. There is value in having a distinction between applications and the web. The act of installing software was important. This doesn’t exist in visiting a web site.

Continue reading “Notes from W3C Workshop on Permissions and User Consent”

Fix Copy/Paste on your Mac

I’ve been having recurring issues with my MacBook Pro not allowing me to copy/paste. It’s especially frustrating with code samples that you don’t want to re-type. This article by OSX Daily has great advice on fixing this issue: Copy Paste Not Working on Mac? Here’s How to Fix a Stuck Clipboard

Reset your clipboard via Terminal

This is the easiest method to fix this issue.

If you prefer to use the Terminal to remedy the problem, do the following:

  1. Open the Terminal application, found in /Applications/Utilities/
  2. Type the following command exactly:

    killall pboard

  3. Hit Return
    1. This will terminate and relaunch the pboard process, which is the clipboard daemon for Mac OS. If you’re savvy with the command line you can immediate test if the clipboard is working as expected with pbcopy and pbpaste, the command line tools that work with the clipboard on the Mac.

      Copy Paste Not Working on Mac? Here’s How to Fix a Stuck Clipboard