There’s a lot of times when you need to find out which item on a page has focus. This is especially tricky when controlling focus as you move in and out of modals and components. Here’s how you can get the object with focus on a web page.
open inspector and choose the console tab.
This will return the element that currently has focus
This site crashed a few months ago really, really, really hard. It looks like it may have been hacked and then exploded when trying to do an update of the plugins and such.
Fortunately, the folks at Dreamhost were able to help me do a complete restore of the site.
Also, I noticed it came back with a theme from around 2006 with valid XHTML. Digg This!
It’s kind of fun to view the source and remember some of the old techniques. Notice this IE6 comment.
<p id=”iewarning”>Sorry, this site is for advanced CSS programming. As such, it is not optimized for IE6. Please visit this site with <a href=”http://www.mozilla.com“>Firefox</a>, <a href=”http://www.opera.com“>Opera</a>, <a href=”http://wwww.mac.com“>Safari</a>, or another modern browser. Microsoft has recently released a beta version of Internet Explorer 7, you may even want to try that for a better internet experience in general.</p>
I came across a bizarre experience while testing a Styled-Component prototype with VoiceOver and Chrome. This simple panel had an H2 in the code, but I couldn’t navigate to it with the screen reader. I opened the accessibility inspector in Chrome and sure enough, the H2 had no semantics. It was being rendered to the Accessibility API as if it was a div.
Much of the value of the internet is based on user trust of the internet. As this trust is broken, the internet is devalued.
The overload of permission requests is causing fatigue and reducing the trust. People are becoming fatigued to cookie reminders and popups and leading to blindly clicking on acceptance.
Loading a permissions request as soon as the page loads doesn’t allow the user to trust the site, what does it represent, and why they should allow the service.
Confusing wording, especially for nefarious purposes
“uncheck here to continue to not receive notifications”
Bundled, implied, inherited permissions. You accept a master permission request without knowing it has a set of sub-permissions.
Blocking content until permissions are granted is keeping users from gaining trust and understanding the value of the site. Tumbler has a full page takeover
(audience includes browser manufacturers, publishers, academia, and W3C leaders)
What is required by law? some of the complexity is part of the legal requirements
Disagree with sharing data, data still shared
Context – what is actually inferred in the data sharing, for instance geolocation providing home location
Can consent be withdrawn easily
Are users really informed, too complex
Permissions process should also follow WCAG accessibility guidelines
Trust is gone, people already assume the system is corrupt.
Signal/noise – confuse user into consent
Understanding a company’s use of data is overwhelming from the inside, due to fragmentation in development process. So how do you legitimately declare your data usage?
Sensors that don’t require permissions can be used for fingerprinting. what should we be prompting for and are there any backwards permissions that need to be adopted.
Users throw up their hands. with so many permissions and sensors being used, people may give up from frustration. fatigue or fatalism
Should settings for what you give consent be in the browser or in the web site.
Readable language may make it easier to read, but it doesn’t mean that it is providing a full grasp of what the permissions are allowing, such as cameras accessing private details that go beyond a selfie or light/color detection (expected use)
Problem is with premise: we need to obtain permission to do these things. Do we need to have them at all? Should browsers be sharing this in the first place? Apple’s storage access API turns off the function. someone that allows this is open to abuse. So, the prompt is at the device level, not the web. What features do we believe the web platform needs? Should there be a baseline for what browsers do not share.
We can build an API that restricts access, but people could realize they didn’t ask for permission, so they use a polyfill that uses a previously consented API to pull in additional information. Such as using the camera app to determine location or sound.
Good example: input type file, drag and dropâ€¦ these are implicitly given permission via the platform.
The browser should be handling the permissions model.
There are three actors:
The perfect actor
The absolute devil
Everyone else. People that provide a useful service, but also want as much data as possible to earn a profit. It’s not that they want as much data, they may be forced to get that much data within the advertising industry. Publishers would prefer browsers stop this.
Advertising is the center of most data abuse. Advertising industry is requiring this data and forcing sites to abuse the process. Brave is an example of a browser that is not allowing third party data exchange.
The internet has grown quickly via organized chaos. Business models are built on this, not all is for abusing the system. But we shouldn’t allow this to prevent the next generation of applications.
should the web give access to sensors and devices? in the term of IoT? How do we allow the web of things while providing privacy, such as discovering other devices? Some devices may not have a display and permissions are asked via secondary interfaces.
There’s still a difficulty of understanding the downstream information from a single page
Who owns this problem?
All of these move at different speeds
The web is inherently casual. There is value in having a distinction between applications and the web. The act of installing software was important. This doesn’t exist in visiting a web site.
If you prefer to use the Terminal to remedy the problem, do the following:
Open the Terminal application, found in /Applications/Utilities/
Type the following command exactly:
This will terminate and relaunch the pboard process, which is the clipboard daemon for Mac OS. If youâ€™re savvy with the command line you can immediate test if the clipboard is working as expected with pbcopy and pbpaste, the command line tools that work with the clipboard on the Mac.